In order for a group to survive effectively, what criteria should tasks be assigned based on?

Assigning tasks based on the personal qualifications of each individual in the group ensures that the right people are matched to the tasks that best suit their skills and abilities. This approach leverages the strengths of each member, promoting efficiency and effectiveness in completing tasks. When tasks are aligned with an individual's expertise, it enhances performance and confidence, fostering a work environment where each member can contribute optimally.

In contrast, assigning tasks based on the desires of the leader might overlook the capabilities of team members, while relying on secret ballot votes for task assignments can lead to decisions that are not made on merit or qualifications. Additionally, considering the feelings of the group at a particular moment can create inconsistency in task assignment, as emotions can fluctuate and may not reflect the best choice for the group's success. Properly evaluating personal qualifications leads to a more cohesive and capable team.