If a person commits an act of arbitrary discrimination, the commanding officer may take which of the following disciplinary actions?

Choosing each of the listed disciplinary actions reflects the command authority's broader range of discretion when responding to acts of arbitrary discrimination.

Assigning lower evaluation marks serves as a documented disciplinary measure indicating that the individual's behavior has negatively impacted their performance or conduct. This form of corrective action allows the commanding officer to formally acknowledge issues that affect both the individual's standing within the organization and its overall culture.

Awarding nonjudicial punishment is a formalized procedure that addresses misconduct without involving a court-martial. It allows commanders to impose penalties for minor offenses while maintaining discipline and order. This option underscores the seriousness with which arbitrary discrimination is treated, as it is a violation of established behavioral standards.

Submitting a recommendation for separation can be a more severe measure reserved for serious violations. It indicates that the commanding officer deems the individual’s behavior so detrimental that continued service is not in the best interest of the command or the service's integrity.

By having this range of responses available, commanding officers can address discriminatory actions appropriately and ensure accountability, thereby maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment.